MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2511187499 · doi:10.3998/ark.5550190.0013.709

Synthesis of protonated ferrocene isomers in the gas phase and their study by mass spectrometry

2012· article· en· W2511187499 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueARKIVOC · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicMass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsIONICS Mass Spectrometry (Canada)
FundersEngineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
KeywordsChemistryProtonationFerroceneMass spectrometryGas phaseComputational chemistryAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Organic chemistryPhysical chemistryChromatographyIonElectrochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Gas phase protonation of ferrocene has been studied experimentally in four different reaction systems, using high energy Collision Induced Decomposition mass spectrometry to follow the progress of reaction at different temperatures and pressures. Experimental evidence is obtained for the existence of three stable isomers as predicted theoretically. The most stable form is shown to be most probably metal-protonated, but the energies of the metal-protonated and agostic forms are within 10 kJ mol -1 of each other. The ring-protonated isomer is higher in energy by 62 kJ mol -1 . Intramolecular isomerization could not be detected, indicating relatively high energy or entropy barriers separating the isomers. The intermediate complex formed by exo attack of t-C4H9 + on ferrocene was also studied and observed to change structure, from a to a -complex, leading to the population of different protonated isomers of ferrocene, depending on the temperature.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.079
Threshold uncertainty score0.979

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it