MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2511227967 · doi:10.1111/hdi.2001.5.1.55

A Comparative Study of C‐Reactive Protein Plasma Levels in Patients on Hemodialysis and Peritoneal Dialysis

2001· article· en· W2511227967 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
María José Fernández‐Reyes, Covadonga Hevia, M. Auxiliadora Bajo, Gloria del Peso, Olga Costero, Juan J. Díez, Rafael Selgas

Bibliographic record

VenueHemodialysis International · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDialysis and Renal Disease Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePeritoneal dialysisHypoalbuminemiaC-reactive proteinHemodialysisInternal medicineGastroenterologyAlbuminDialysisSerum albuminNephelometryHemoglobinTransferrinFerritinCreatinineBlood urea nitrogenInflammationImmunology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In dialysis patients, C‐reactive protein (CRP), a well‐recognized marker of inflammation, predicts mortality. Higher levels have been described in hemodialysis (HD) patients as compared with peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients. Our aim was to determine, based on CRP plasma levels, the degree of inflammation in HD patients using low‐permeability polysulfone membranes and relatively pure dialysate, and that in PD patients. A secondary objective was to study factors associated with hypoalbuminemia and inflammation in both populations. We studied 69 stable patients on dialysis (32 on HD and 37 on PD). The mean age was 69.9 ± 8.2 years, and the mean time on dialysis was 27 months. The two populations were comparable for overall and cardiovascular comorbidities. Nephelometry was used to measure CRP plasma levels (normal levels < 0.6 mg/dL). The Kt/Vurea, corrected for residual renal clearance, and the equivalent of protein nitrogen appearance (PNA) were also calculated. Of the patients studied, 53% showed CRP plasma levels higher than 0.6 mg/dL; in 36%, the levels were higher than 1 mg/dL. No significant differences in these percentages were noted between the two dialysis groups. Patients with CRP levels higher than 1 mg/dL showed lower serum albumin, iron, hemoglobin, and transferrin levels, and higher ferritin values and leukocyte counts. Under logistic regression analysis, CRP levels higher and lower than 1 mg/dL were significantly associated with serum albumin [p = 0.01; odds ratio (OR): 0.15], iron (p = 0.006; OR: 0.96), transferrin (p = 0.004; OR: 0.97), and hemoglobin (p = 0.02; OR: 0.67). Serum albumin levels were significantly lower in PD patients. Under regression analysis, serum albumin levels correlated with cholesterol (r: 0.25; p = 0.04), serum iron (r: 0.5; p = 0.0001), transferrin (r: 0.3; p = 0.015), ultrafiltration capacity (r: 0.42; p = 0.008), and CRP values above 0.6 mg/dL (r: –0.65; p = 0.001). In conclusion, the frequent elevation of CRP plasma levels observed in both HD and PD patients suggests the presence of a silent inflammatory state. Hemodialysis performed with biocompatible, low‐permeability membranes is not associated with higher CRP plasma levels than those seen in PD. In both groups, hypoalbuminemia is related to CRP level. Levels of serum albumin, slightly lower in PD patients, are also related to peritoneal ultrafiltration capacity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHemodialysis International→Same topicDialysis and Renal Disease Management→French-language works237,207→