MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2511285872 · doi:10.1149/ma2016-02/22/1654

Synthesis of Novel Graphene Composite Adsorbent for Water Treatment By Adsorption and Electrochemical Regeneration

2016· article· en· W2511285872 on OpenAlexaff
Farbod Sharif, Edward P.L. Roberts

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Meeting Abstracts · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMembrane Separation Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAdsorptionGrapheneRegeneration (biology)Composite numberElectrochemistryMaterials scienceWater treatmentChemical engineeringNanotechnologyChemistryComposite materialElectrodeEnvironmental scienceEnvironmental engineeringOrganic chemistryEngineeringCell biology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

One of the efficient and cost effective ways to remove organic contaminants from water is adsorption coupled with electrochemical oxidation. Graphite intercalated compounds (GIC) and activated carbons (AC) are among the common adsorbents for the adsorption - electrochemical regeneration process; nevertheless, they have significant shortcomings, i.e. GIC has low adsorptive capacity, whereas AC requires long regeneration time and high energy consumption associated with low current efficiency and high cell voltages. Owing to their huge surface area and high electrical conductivity, graphene-based materials are promising candidates as adsorbents suitable for electrochemical regeneration. This results in higher adsorptive capacity and current efficiency compared to AC and GIC. In this study, we prepared different types of graphene-based materials, namely graphene foam and magnetite reduced graphene oxide (rGO). The synthesized materials were characterized and tested for adsorption and electrochemical regeneration. Our findings revealed that, in addition to high current efficiency (greater than 80 %), these materials had a good adsorptive capacity compared to GIC. However, during the regeneration, graphene was oxidized and corroded after only a few cycles, contaminating the treated water. In the case of graphene foam, the integrity of the foam was lost after electrochemical regeneration. In order to overcome this corrosion problem and increase the current efficiency, a new composite was developed that is resistant to oxidation. The composite was characterized using scanning electron microscopy, transmission electron microscopy, X-ray diffraction and Raman spectroscopy. Methylene blue was employed as a model adsorbate in synthetic wastewater samples. Regeneration was carried out in an electrolytic cell operated at a constant current. In spite of the slight reduction in adsorptive capacity compared to the pure graphene, the composite facilitated the oxidation of the organics to an extent in which a current efficiency of around 100 % was achieved. TEM images indicated that the composite was not significantly corroded during the electrochemical treatment. Even after ten cycles of adsorption and regeneration, no reduction in the adsorptive capacity and no contamination of the treated water was observed. In brief, the results of the current study introduce graphene composites as efficient materials for the adsorption - electrochemical regeneration process.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.260

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueECS Meeting AbstractsSame topicMembrane Separation TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207