Age‐ and sex‐related changes in rat renal function and pathology following neonatal hyperoxia exposure
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Preterm neonates are prematurely exposed to high oxygen levels at birth which may adversely impact ongoing renal development. The aim of this study was to determine the effects of neonatal hyperoxia exposure on renal function and morphology with aging. Sprague Dawley rat pups were raised in a hyperoxic environment (80% oxygen) from P3 to P10 during ongoing postnatal nephrogenesis. Control litters were kept in room air (n = 6-8 litters/group; one male, one female/litter/age). Kidney function (urine and plasma creatinine, sodium, and protein) and morphology (renal corpuscle size, glomerulosclerosis, fibrosis, and glomerular crescents) were assessed at 1, 5, and 11 months of age. Neonatal hyperoxia exposure had no impact on body or kidney weights. Creatinine clearance was significantly reduced following hyperoxia exposure at 5 months; there was no significant effect on renal function at 1 or 11 months. The percentage of crescentic glomeruli (indicative of glomerular injury) was markedly increased in 11 month hyperoxia-exposed males. Renal corpuscle size, glomerulosclerosis index, and renal fibrosis were not affected. Findings suggest that exposure to high oxygen levels during development may impact renal functional capacity and increase susceptibility to renal disease in adulthood depending on age and sex.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".