MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2511343645 · doi:10.1190/geo2015-0481.1

3D inversion for multipulse airborne transient electromagnetic data

2016· article· en· W2511343645 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueGeophysics · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeophysical and Geoelectrical Methods
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsInversion (geology)AlgorithmComputer scienceFrequency domainWaveformTime domainComputationSynthetic dataSuperposition principleConvolution (computer science)MathematicsGeologyArtificial intelligenceTelecommunicationsComputer visionArtificial neural network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Multipulse airborne transient electromagnetic (ATEM) systems transmit one high-power pulse and one low-power pulse containing more high-frequency EM signals. Such systems have better near-surface resolutions while maintaining the depth of exploration of other conventional systems. ATEM systems are especially suitable for geologic mapping and mineral exploration. The inversion of multipulse ATEM data has been mainly limited to 1D modeling, which is not suitable for complex underground structures. We have investigated an algorithm for 3D multipulse ATEM data inversion based on direct Gauss-Newton optimization with quite-fast convergence. The forward problems were solved in the frequency-domain based on the secondary scattered electrical field equation, and then the inverse Fourier transform and the convolution with transmitting waveform were applied to calculate the arbitrary waveform response and sensitivity matrix in the time domain. To optimize the number of computations and memory, we further used an EM “footprint” concept in our inversions to reduce the forward model size and sparse the sensitivity matrix. The inversion results of synthetic data showed that our 3D algorithm is very effective for inverting the multipulse data with results combining advantageous resolutions of different transmitting pulses. Finally, we applied our algorithm to invert real survey data obtained at McMurray, Alberta, Canada, to further test its effectiveness.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.993
Threshold uncertainty score0.683

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it