MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2511500870 · doi:10.1109/eucnc.2016.7561064

Resource optimization of TCAM-based SDN measurements via diminishing-points autodetection

2016· article· en· W2511500870 on OpenAlexaff
Ahmed Abada

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSoftware-Defined Networks and 5G
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceResource allocationResource management (computing)Distributed computingResource (disambiguation)Task (project management)SoftwareReal-time computingComputer networkOperating systemSystems engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Network measurement is an important tool for network managers and operators since it provides the information needed to carry out different management tasks. However, because of the rapid increase in data link speeds and the volume of traffic carried by modern networks, the availability of system resources dedicated to network measurement has always been the main limiting factor in developing modern measurement solutions. The emergence of Software Defined Networks in recent years has inspired the development of new measurement solutions that takes advantage of the capabilities offered by this new paradigm such as programmability and central management [9]. Current SDN enabled measurement solutions are able to orchestrate the execution and resources allocation of network-wide measurement tasks but still falls short in their ability to recognize efficient operating points (amount of allocated resources) for running tasks and often results in inefficient resources utilization. In this paper we provide a novel resource allocation method that continuously estimates the resources-accuracy relationships for running tasks, infers their individual points of diminishing-returns and uses the resulting value of each task as it's target point of operation in order to achieve a more efficient resource utilization. In contrast to existing work, our proposed method maximizes the return on used system resources and results in lower drop rates of running tasks as shown by our simulations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.878
Threshold uncertainty score0.325

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSoftware-Defined Networks and 5GFrench-language works237,207