MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2511507007 · doi:10.1039/c6nr04868d

A nanoparticle-based thermo-dynamic aptasensor for small molecule detection

2016· article· en· W2511507007 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Feriel Mélaïne, Clothilde Coilhac, Yoann Roupioz, Arnaud Buhot

Bibliographic record

VenueNanoscale · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicAdvanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersIndigenous and Northern Affairs CanadaAgence Nationale de la Recherche
KeywordsAptamerSurface plasmon resonanceBiosensorNanotechnologyNanoparticleSmall moleculeMolecular recognitionDNAAnalyteColloidal goldMaterials scienceMoleculeCombinatorial chemistryChemistryMolecular biologyBiologyBiochemistryChromatography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Small molecules (MW < 1000 Da) represent a large class of biomarkers of interest. Recently, a new class of biosensors has been emerging thanks to the recognition properties of aptamers, short DNA or RNA single strands, selected against such small molecular targets. Among them, an adenosine-specific aptamer has been largely described and used due to its remarkable affinity to this small target (KD = 6 μM). In this paper, we achieved the proof-of-principle of an aptasensor based on the thermodynamic follow-up of adenosine binding with engineered split-aptamer sequences. The detection is carried out by surface plasmon resonance imaging of split-aptamer micro-arrays, while signal amplification is ensured by gold nanoparticles (AuNPs). This original approach based on DNA sequence engineering and AuNP conjugation enabled us to reach limits of detection (LOD) 200 times lower than the KD measured in solution with the native aptamer (LOD = 30 nM).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.124
Threshold uncertainty score0.374

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNanoscaleSame topicAdvanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniquesFrench-language works237,207