The Impact of Meurofeedback-Based Therapy on Reducing Test Anxiety and Shyness of Female Students at Competitive Dxamination Level
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The main objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of neurofeedback-based treatment in reducing test anxiety and shyness of female students at competitive examination level in Ahvaz. The sample consisted of 40 students at competitive examination level that were selected by available sampling method from students referred to Ahvaz Aramesh counseling clinic, which were randomly divided into two experimental (n=20) and control (n=20) groups. The tools used were Friedman Test Anxiety Questionnaire (1997) and Stanford Shyness Questionnaire (1997). The experimental group received fifteen 30-minute sessions (three sessions per week) of neurofeedback treatment program. The study design was a semi-experimental and pretest-posttest one with control group. The results obtained using analysis of variance (ANCOVA) at significance level of α=0.05 showed that the neurofeedback-based therapy has an impact on reducing test anxiety and shyness of female students at competitive examination level in Ahvaz.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".