MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Outcomes of hypofractionated palliative radiotherapy for choroidal metastases.

2015· article· en· W2511578317 on OpenAlexaff
Ezra Hahn, Juan P. Velazquez-Martin, Sohel Somani, Pedro Salazar, D. Domville, David G. Payne, Wei Xu, Jie Su, Charles J. Pavlin, Rand Simpson, Normand Laperrière, Hatem Krema, John Waldron, Caroline Chung

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOcular Oncology and Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity Health NetworkUniversity of TorontoPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineEnucleationRadiation therapyVisual acuityExternal beam radiotherapyRetrospective cohort studyChoroidPrimary tumorCancerSurgeryMetastasisBrachytherapyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

194 Background: External beam radiotherapy (RT) is an effective palliative treatment for choroidal metastases aimed at preserving vision and obtaining local tumor control. Delivery of 30-40 Gy in 2 Gy daily fractions is a standard approach in many centers. At our center, a shorter, more convenient schedule of 20 Gy in 5 fractions has been used in this palliative setting. This study reports the efficacy and toxicity of this hypofractionated RT approach. Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of patients treated in the Ocular Oncology clinic at Princess Margaret Cancer Center who received RT (20 Gy in 5 fractions) for choroidal metastases between January 1, 1999 and November 30, 2012. Primary outcome measures were change in visual acuity and tumor response. Secondary outcomes included toxicities of RT, tumor control, and overall survival from the date of choroidal metastases diagnosis. Results: A total of 55 patients with 71 involved eyes were included. Decreased vision was the presenting symptom in 43 eyes (61%). Visual acuity improved from a median of 20/70 to 20/40 between baseline assessment and last follow-up, and remained stable or improved in 56 eyes (80%). On ultrasound, tumor regression was observed in 64 eyes (91%) with complete response in 47 eyes (67%). Metastases progressed in 4 eyes (6%) despite RT with 1 eye requiring enucleation. Median survival after diagnosis of choroidal metastases was 13 months with estimated overall survival at 1, 2, and 3 years to be 50% (36-62), 23% (12-35), and 8% (3-18), respectively. Forty-nine patients (89%) did not experience any acute complications. Mild acute toxicities included transitory dryness in 5 patients and episcleritis in 1 patient. Cataracts developed in 4 eyes (6%), retinopathy in 1 eye, optic neuropathy in 7 eyes (10%), pigmentary maculopathy in 5 eyes (7%), and neovascular glaucoma in 1 eye. Conclusions: A short fractionation schedule of 20 Gy in 5 fractions is a well-tolerated treatment that effectively preserves vision and gains local tumor control for many patients with choroidal metastases. This hypofractionated approach would help reduce the burden of a longer treatment course in this palliative patient population.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.267
GPT teacher head0.549
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical OncologySame topicOcular Oncology and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207