MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2511654132 · doi:10.11159/cdsr16.109

Design and Control of a Robotic Assistive Device for Hand Rehabilitation (RAD-HR)

2016· article· en· W2511654132 on OpenAlexaff
Christopher Spiewak, Mohammad Arifur Rahaman, Mohammad Habibur Rahman, Roshan M. D’Souza, Maarouf Saad

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the International Conference of Control, Dynamic systems, and Robotics · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicStroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRehabilitationComputer scienceControl (management)Human–computer interactionMedical roboticsAssistive devicePhysical medicine and rehabilitationRobotArtificial intelligencePhysical therapyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To assist the elderly and/or physically disabled people who no longer possess proper function of their hand motion, we have been developing a robotic assistive device to rehabilitate the hand motions to improve quality of life.The proposed assistive device will be comprised of three degrees of freedom enabling basic movements and hand function.In this research we have focused on the modeling and control of the proposed assistive device.To achieve the dynamic simulation of the developed model, nonlinear computed torque control technique was employed.In the simulation, the trajectory tracking performance of the controller was evaluated.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the International Conference of Control, Dynamic systems, and RoboticsSame topicStroke Rehabilitation and RecoveryFrench-language works237,207