MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2511675459 · doi:10.1021/acs.macromol.5b00806

Quantifying the Level of Intermacromolecular Interactions in Ethylene–Propylene Copolymers by Using Pyrene Excimer Formation

2015· article· en· W2511675459 on OpenAlexaff
Solmaz Pirouz, Jean Duhamel, Sheng Jiang, Akhilesh Duggal

Bibliographic record

VenueMacromolecules · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicSurfactants and Colloidal Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExcimerCopolymerPyreneEthylenePolymer chemistryEthylene propylene rubberChemistryPhotochemistryChemical engineeringMaterials scienceOrganic chemistryPolymerCatalysisFluorescenceOpticsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A unique methodology based on fluorescence measurements is introduced to quantitatively measure the actual level of interpolymeric association between ethylene–propylene (EP) copolymers used as viscosity index improvers (VIIs) in engine oils. To this end, two EP copolymers, one amorphous (EP(AM)) and the other semicrystalline (EP(SM)), were maleated and then fluorescently labeled with 1-pyrenemethylamine and 2-(2-naphthyl)ethylamine to yield Py-EP and Np-EP, respectively. Successful maleation and fluorescence labeling were confirmed by Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy. The level of crystallinity of the EP copolymers was inferred from FTIR, carbon nuclear magnetic resonance ( 13 C NMR), and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) experiments. The solution behavior of the EP copolymers was characterized by conducting intrinsic viscosity measurements as a function of temperature to define the temperature range where fluorescence studies should be conducted. Fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) experiments were used to demonstrate the existence of interpolymeric associations, but a quantitative measure of the actual level of association, such as the molar fraction of interpolymeric interaction ( f inter ) between EP copolymers, could not be determined by FRET. However, taking advantage of the fact that the fluorescence intensity ratio I E / I M of excimer-to-monomer is directly proportional to the local pyrene concentration [Py] loc of a pyrene-labeled polymer, a quantitative measure of the actual level of intermolecular association was obtained by measuring the I E / I M ratio. Results showed that f inter of pyrene-labeled EP(SM) increased upon decreasing the temperature and increasing the polymer concentration as would have been expected from such a polymer. This result suggests that pyrene excimer formation provides a reliable method to quantitatively determine f inter for EP copolymers used as VIIs, an information which is otherwise difficult to extract from standard FRET experiments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.650

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.144
GPT teacher head0.333
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMacromoleculesSame topicSurfactants and Colloidal SystemsFrench-language works237,207