Investigation of the Effects of the Company’s Capabilities on Attracting External Collaboration and Company’s Performance
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
<p>One of the major tasks of the managers is achieving the coordination between the company and external environment to enhance the company’s financial performance. This research aimed to focus on attracting external effective collaboration, and first investigate effects of three capabilities of innovation, information, and relational on it, and then examine the effect of this factor on market and financial performance of the studied companies. At first, the variables of innovation capability, information capability, relational capability, company’s financial performance, company’s market performance, and also attracting external effective collaboration were studied in the review of literature. Then, a questionnaire was designed and distributed among the companies that were participated in Tehran international exhibitions and collected data was analyzed by correlation coefficient tests and structural equation modeling. To analyze the data Excel, SPSS, and Amos software were used. Findings showed that the relational, information, and innovation capabilities of company can increase companies financial and market performance through attracting external collaboration.</p>
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it