MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2511749199

IM 2012 Round-ups: Soda ash

2013· article· de· W2511749199 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
E. D. Hughes

Bibliographic record

VenueIndustrial Minerals · 2013
Typearticle
Languagede
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicIndian Economic and Social Development
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuarter (Canadian coin)ChinaAgricultural economicsFlooding (psychology)BusinessEngineeringProduction (economics)Natural resource economicsEnvironmental scienceWaste managementGeographyArchaeologyEconomics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

treatment of SOEs is of particular concern to ANSAC because nearly half (48%) of China's soda ash production comes from producers that are either fully or partially state-owned, including two of its largest producers, John Andrews, ANSAC president wrote. The company, India's largest producer and global number two, said in its financial year Q1 results that while demand for soda ash was stable in first quarter, the demand environment could weaken. Elsewhere, [R Mukundan] said that Tata faced unprecedented challenges during quarter, which adversely impacted operating performance. This included flooding of company's Magadi soda ash plant in Kenya, following an unseasonably heavy rainfall.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.242
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0240.080

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.072
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.148 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIndustrial MineralsSame topicIndian Economic and Social DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207