MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2511819269 · doi:10.4000/communication.6985

Inka SALOVAARA-MORING (dir.) (2009), Manufacturing Europe. Spaces of Democracy, Diversity and Communication

2016· article· en· W2511819269 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Gérald Arboit

Bibliographic record

VenueCommunication · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPolitical and Social Issues
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDemocracyHumanitiesDiversity (politics)European unionPolitical sciencePublic sphereSociologyPhilosophyPoliticsAnthropologyEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La communication dans l’Union européenne et le rôle des communicants européens sont un marronnier des études de sciences politiques et d’information-communication, voire d’histoire. L’ouvrage dirigé par Inka Salovaara-Moring, bien que dédié aux « espaces de démocratie, de diversité et de communication », n’échappe pas à la loi du genre. Il est ainsi la synthèse d’un programme de recherche de l’Académie de Finlande, entre 2005 et 2007, intitulé « The European Public Sphere(s) : United or Divid...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.068

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0050.006
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0040.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0200.010

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCommunicationSame topicPolitical and Social IssuesFrench-language works237,207