MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2511822650 · doi:10.1057/978-1-137-48854-1_6

Daughters and Sons of ’84: Dissenting Performances of Labor and Love

2016· book-chapter· en· W2511822650 on OpenAlexaffabout
Michael Nijhawan

Bibliographic record

VenuePalgrave Macmillan US eBooks · 2016
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicSouth Asian Studies and Diaspora
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDissenting opinionNarrativeCitizenshipGender studiesJuvenile delinquencySociologyPoetryCriminologyPolitical scienceLiteratureLawArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The following chapter contributes to the study of cultural and youth citizenship. The specific debate on Sikh youth practices and artistic forms is set against the background of dominant public framings of Sikh youth in categories of terrorism and juvenile delinquency in Canada. A discussion of emerging Sikh youth movements and their 1984 commemorative events in Toronto form the core part of the chapter. Drawing on in-depth narrative interviews and poetic texts, Nijhawan portrays a next generation of young Sikhs who found in the 1984 idiom a powerful tool to come to terms with a difficult past and at the same time imagine a new future for youth activism informed by Sikh ethical principles.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.918
Threshold uncertainty score0.885

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePalgrave Macmillan US eBooksSame topicSouth Asian Studies and DiasporaFrench-language works237,207