MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2511851358 · doi:10.1186/s41200-016-0076-8

New extension range and complementary description of Eurytemora americana (Calanoida: Temoridae) in northern Korea

2016· article· en· W2511851358 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Seong Yong Moon, Jung Hwa Choi, Jung-Nyun Kim, Sun-Kil Kim, Balu Alagar Venmathi Maran

Bibliographic record

VenueMarine Biodiversity Records · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicMarine Biology and Ecology Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Institute of Fisheries Science
KeywordsCalanoidaRange (aeronautics)Brackish waterOceanographyNorthern HemisphereGeographyCopepodFish migrationSeamountEstuarySouthern HemisphereBiologyFisheryEcologyGeologyCrustaceanFish <Actinopterygii>ClimatologySalinity

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The brackish calanoid, Eurytemora americana Williams, 1906, is reported in the northern part of Korea. It is found to be an important copepod in the mesozooplankton community structure from the estuarine and shallow waters. The range extension and of E. americana is reported additionally to previously known distributional range from brackish waters of the South Atlantic Ocean, United Kingdom, Canada, English Channel, Iceland, the North Atlantic Ocean, the North Pacific Ocean (Japan, Korea, and Russia), and the North Sea. In this study, both sexes of E. americana are redescribed and illustrated including their undescribed mouthparts. The most important characters that have been overlooked in the previous descriptions are: shape of the last pedigerous somite in female, structure of the genital double-somite, and ornamentation of the fifth leg in both sexes. The distributional range of E. americana is now given with its northern and southern hemisphere limit as 70 to 37°N in the North Pacific and 38°S in the Southwest Atlantic.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.129
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMarine Biodiversity RecordsSame topicMarine Biology and Ecology ResearchFrench-language works237,207