MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2511923304 · doi:10.1109/antem.2016.7550224

An antenna for switch beam, multi-beam millimetre-wave cellular systems

2016· article· en· W2511923304 on OpenAlexaff
David Lee, J. Shaker, Yahia M. M. Antar

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrowave Engineering and Waveguides
Canadian institutionsRoyal Military College of Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBeamwidthOpticsLuneburg lensLens (geology)Antenna (radio)Extremely high frequencyAntenna efficiencyMaterials sciencePhysicsRadiation patternOptoelectronicsElectrical engineeringEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents the design and implementation of a compact, two-dimensional antenna with broadband performance capable of increasing system capacity for next generation 5G base stations. This simple low profile, parallel plate Luneburg lens can be exploited to ensure high energy efficiency, higher data rates, spectral efficiency, and extended coverage leading to a reduction in the number of physical base station antennas, and towers. Inserted between the parallel plates are two identical machined dielectric lens profiles each with a smooth dielectric permittivity gradient, varying from 2 at the center to 1 at the edge corresponding to Luneburg lens design specification. The lens is fed by ultra-low loss open-ended waveguides with probe launchers to inject multiple independent beams at the lens surface and between the plates. The broadband lens has a 3-dB beamwidth of 40° × 5.3° in the E and H plane and an average radiation efficiency greater than 70%. Cross-polarization and port isolation is greater than 30 dB, allowing for the effective co-existence of multiple input beams. The switch beam antenna implementation was optimized to operate in the Ku-band but can be scaled to any suitable mm-wave frequency.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMicrowave Engineering and Waveguides→French-language works237,207→