Stroke Prediction Context-Aware Health Care System
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper proposes a prediction framework based on ontology and Bayesian Belief Networks BBN to support a medical teams in every daily. We propose a Stroke Prediction System (SPS), a new software component to handle the uncertainty of having a stroke disease by determining the risk score level. This is composed of four layers: acquisition of data, aggregation, reasoning and application. SPS senses, collects, and analyzes data of a patient, then uses wearable sensors and the mobile application to interact with the patient and staffs. When the risk reaches critical limits, SPS notifies all concerned parties, the patient, the doctor, and the emergency department. The patient profile is also updated to reflect this urgent intervention requirement. A Bayesian model is designed and implemented using the Netica tool to prove its efficiency i) by handling patient context remotely and verifying its changes locally and ii) on predicting missing probabilities and calculate the probability of high risk level for emergency cases. The SPS system improves the accuracy of decision making and uses a new ontology of stroke disease inspired from our Parkinson ontology already developed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".