MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2511989316 · doi:10.1109/access.2016.2603976

Deep Randomly-Connected Conditional Random Fields For Image Segmentation

2016· article· en· W2511989316 on OpenAlexafffund
Mohammad Javad Shafiee, Alexander Wong, Paul Fieguth

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Access · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research ChairsOntario Ministry of Economic Development and Innovation
KeywordsConditional random fieldRandom fieldComputer scienceInferenceMarkov random fieldSegmentationImage segmentationArtificial intelligenceRandom graphPrior probabilityMaximum a posteriori estimationMarkov chainRange (aeronautics)Pattern recognition (psychology)Theoretical computer scienceGraphMachine learningMathematicsBayesian probability

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The use of Markov random fields (MRFs) is a common approach for performing image segmentation, where the problem is modeled using MRFs that incorporate priors on neighborhood nodes to allow for efficient Maximum a Posteriori inference. These local MRF models often result in smoothed segmentation boundaries, since they penalize the assignment of different labels to neighboring pixels and are limited in the use of long-range interactions. Although recent work on fully connected random fields and deep random fields has shown to be very promising in addressing these issues, both streams of approaches face certain limitations, which could affect inference performance and computational tractability. In this paper, we introduce the concept of deep randomly connected conditional random fields DRCRF, which fuse fully-connected random fields and deep random fields together to obtain benefits from long-range interactions while allowing for efficient inference using arbitrary potential functions. Leveraging random graph theory, the concept of stochastic cliques is incorporated into a deep CRF structure to take better advantage of long-range interactions while maintaining computational tractability. The experimental results demonstrate that the proposed DRCRF framework outperforms existing fully connected CRF frameworks and provides results comparable to the principled deep random field framework, which is among the state of the art in random field frameworks for image segmentation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.887
Threshold uncertainty score0.318

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.340
Teacher spread0.316 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE AccessSame topicAdvanced Image and Video Retrieval TechniquesFrench-language works237,207