MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2512019831 · doi:10.1109/spawc.2016.7536803

Performance analysis of MRC/MRT relaying in massive MIMO systems via interference modelling

2016· article· en· W2512019831 on OpenAlexaff
Qian Wang, Yindi Jing

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCooperative Communication and Network Coding
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRelayInterference (communication)MIMOMaximal-ratio combiningSignal-to-noise ratio (imaging)Computer scienceProbability density functionTopology (electrical circuits)Transmission (telecommunications)Power (physics)Signal-to-interference-plus-noise ratioSignal-to-interference ratioOutage probabilityElectronic engineeringTelecommunicationsMathematicsDecoding methodsStatisticsFadingElectrical engineeringBeamformingPhysicsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This work analyses the performance of multi-user massive MIMO relay networks, where the relay station is equipped with a large number of antennas. The combination of maximal-ratio-combining (MRC) and maximal-ratio-transmission (MRT) is utilized at the relay for low-complexity processing. Different from existing work, we consider the practical scenario with limited number of users, fixed source power, and fixed relay power. Our work shows that the interference is neither negligible nor asymptotically deterministic, and it dominates the statistical properties of the signal-to-interference-plus-noise ratio (SINR). Via deriving an approximation on the probability density function (PDF) of the interference power, analytical results on the sum-rate and outage probability performance of the multi-user relay network are obtained.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCooperative Communication and Network CodingFrench-language works237,207