DUSP1 Maintains IRF1 and Leads to Increased Expression of IRF1-dependent Genes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Although the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) phosphatase, DUSP1, mediates dexamethasone-induced repression of MAPKs, 14 of 46 interleukin-1β (IL1B)-induced mRNAs were significantly enhanced by DUSP1 overexpression in pulmonary A549 cells. These include the interferon regulatory factor, IRF1, and the chemokine, CXCL10. Of these, DUSP1-enhanced mRNAs, 10 including CXCL10, were IRF1-dependent. MAPK inhibitors and DUSP1 overexpression prolonged IRF1 expression by elevating transcription and increasing IRF1 mRNA and protein stability. Conversely, DUSP1 silencing increased IL1B-induced MAPK phosphorylation while significantly reducing IRF1 protein expression at 4 h. This confirms a regulatory network whereby DUSP1 switches off MAPKs to maintain IRF1 expression. There was no repression of IRF1 expression by dexamethasone in primary human bronchial epithelial cells, and in A549 cells IL1B-induced IRF1 protein was only modestly and transiently repressed. Although dexamethasone did not repress IL1B-induced IRF1 protein expression at 4–6 h, silencing of IL1B plus dexamethasone-induced DUSP1 significantly reduced IRF1 expression. IL1B-induced expression of CXCL10 was largely insensitive to dexamethasone, whereas other DUSP1-enhanced, IRF1-dependent mRNAs showed various degrees of repression. With IL1B plus dexamethasone, CXCL10 expression was also IRF1-dependent, and expression was reduced by DUSP1 silencing. Thus, IL1B plus dexamethasone-induced DUSP1 maintains expression of IRF1 and the IRF1-dependent gene, CXCL10. This is supported by chromatin immunoprecipitation showing IRF1 recruitment to be essentially unaffected by dexamethasone at the CXCL10 promoter or at the promoters of more highly repressed IRF1-dependent genes. Since IRF1-dependent genes, such as CXCL10, are central to host defense, these data may help explain the reduced effectiveness of glucocorticoids during asthma exacerbations. Although the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) phosphatase, DUSP1, mediates dexamethasone-induced repression of MAPKs, 14 of 46 interleukin-1β (IL1B)-induced mRNAs were significantly enhanced by DUSP1 overexpression in pulmonary A549 cells. These include the interferon regulatory factor, IRF1, and the chemokine, CXCL10. Of these, DUSP1-enhanced mRNAs, 10 including CXCL10, were IRF1-dependent. MAPK inhibitors and DUSP1 overexpression prolonged IRF1 expression by elevating transcription and increasing IRF1 mRNA and protein stability. Conversely, DUSP1 silencing increased IL1B-induced MAPK phosphorylation while significantly reducing IRF1 protein expression at 4 h. This confirms a regulatory network whereby DUSP1 switches off MAPKs to maintain IRF1 expression. There was no repression of IRF1 expression by dexamethasone in primary human bronchial epithelial cells, and in A549 cells IL1B-induced IRF1 protein was only modestly and transiently repressed. Although dexamethasone did not repress IL1B-induced IRF1 protein expression at 4–6 h, silencing of IL1B plus dexamethasone-induced DUSP1 significantly reduced IRF1 expression. IL1B-induced expression of CXCL10 was largely insensitive to dexamethasone, whereas other DUSP1-enhanced, IRF1-dependent mRNAs showed various degrees of repression. With IL1B plus dexamethasone, CXCL10 expression was also IRF1-dependent, and expression was reduced by DUSP1 silencing. Thus, IL1B plus dexamethasone-induced DUSP1 maintains expression of IRF1 and the IRF1-dependent gene, CXCL10. This is supported by chromatin immunoprecipitation showing IRF1 recruitment to be essentially unaffected by dexamethasone at the CXCL10 promoter or at the promoters of more highly repressed IRF1-dependent genes. Since IRF1-dependent genes, such as CXCL10, are central to host defense, these data may help explain the reduced effectiveness of glucocorticoids during asthma exacerbations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".