A monochromatic x-ray irradiation system for <i>in vitro</i> studies at synchrotron beamlines
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The use of synchrotron light in radiobiological keV x-ray in vitro studies has been accompanied by compromises in culture conditions and sample handling procedures. The presented monochromatic x-ray system bridges the gap between synchrotron science and cell biology by facilitating the irradiation of adherent cells uninterruptedly maintained under cell type-specific conditions throughout the entire experiment. The system for horizontal irradiations consists of a single crystal Laue monochromator, a beam monitor, and a scanning sample stage. As implemented at the BMIT-BM beamline, the system enables homogeneous cell culture irradiations with intense and purely monochromatic x-ray beams (10–30 keV). The first MCF-7 dose-response study demonstrates how the establishment of a stress-minimized experimental procedure leads to accurate and precise in vitro irradiation results. The cell survival as a function of the surface dose is well described by a first-order exponential decay, indicating that the cellular damage induced by 11.9 keV x-rays is comparable to the lethal effects caused by high linear energy transfer particles. The system design opens up the pathway for combined live-cell imaging and monochromatic keV x-ray applications, while the implementation of the system at insertion device beamlines can help to establish novel investigations on the fundamental role of photonactivation agents in an energy regime up to 100 keV.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.015 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".