MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2512430853 · doi:10.1190/segam2016-13844039.1

Seismic imaging of a thin unconventional reservoir in highly attenuating media: The case of the Macasty Formation, Anticosti Island, Canada

2016· article· en· W2512430853 on OpenAlexaffabout
Mathieu J. Duchesne, Zhuoheng Chen, Denis Lavoie

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicSeismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques
Canadian institutionsGeological Survey of Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyGeophysical imagingSeismology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Seismic wave propagation through the subsurface is characterized by a loss of high frequency energy desired for high-resolution imaging at depth. This means that the size of geological features that can be resolved increases with depth. In this context, exploration of thin-layered unconventional reservoirs represents a significant challenge for seismic imaging. Here the case of the Macasty Formation, a thin-layered shale reservoir included in a highly attenuating limestone-dominated Silurian-Ordovician succession, is discussed. To retrieve high frequency energy, Q-phase compensation, zero-phase deconvolution and a 90°-phase rotation followed by the application of a Butterworth filter are used. Results provide an amplitude spectrum that is flatter and broader compared to the original data. New imaging resolves internal high amplitude reflections within the reservoir that are correlative to higher TOC values of the pay-zone. Presentation Date: Monday, October 17, 2016 Start Time: 1:25:00 PM Location: 156 Presentation Type: ORAL

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.203
Threshold uncertainty score0.408

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.203
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSeismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques→French-language works237,207→