MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2512784634 · doi:10.1021/acs.joc.6b01501

Chemical Insight into the Mechanism and Specificity of GlfT2, a Bifunctional Galactofuranosyltransferase from Mycobacteria

2016· review· en· W2512784634 on OpenAlexafffund
Myles B. Poulin, Todd L. Lowary

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Organic Chemistry · 2016
Typereview
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicProbiotics and Fermented Foods
Canadian institutionsAlberta Glycomics CentreUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaAlberta Glycomics CentreAlberta Innovates - Technology Futures
KeywordsChemistryMechanism (biology)BifunctionalCombinatorial chemistryBiochemistryEpistemology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Mycobacteria, including the human pathogen Mycobacterium tuberculosis, produce a complex cell wall structure that is essential to survival. A key component of this structure is a glycoconjugate, the mycolyl-arabinogalactan-peptidoglycan complex, which has at its core a galactan domain composed of galactofuranose (Galf) residues linked to peptidoglycan. Because galactan biosynthesis is essential for mycobacterial viability, compounds that interfere with this process are potential therapeutic agents for treating mycobacterial diseases, including tuberculosis. Galactan biosynthesis in mycobacteria involves two glycosyltransferases, GlfT1 and GlfT2, which have been the subject of increasing interest in recent years. This Synopsis summarizes efforts to characterize the mechanism and specificity of GlfT2, which is responsible for introducing the majority of the Galf residues into mycobacterial galactan.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Organic ChemistrySame topicProbiotics and Fermented FoodsFrench-language works237,207