MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2512830103 · doi:10.1300/j523v23n01_08

A Proposal to Reduce Psychiatric Nurse Shortages:<i>Or</i>Does ‘Nursing’ Really Serve the Cause of Mental Health?

2007· article· en· W2512830103 on OpenAlexaff
Emily Hayes, John J. Collins

Bibliographic record

VenueSocial Work in Public Health · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicWorkplace Health and Well-being
Canadian institutionsPositive Living North
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNursingMental healthEconomic shortagePsychiatryMedicineMental health nursingPsychologyGovernment (linguistics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Using international and historical comparisons, the authors examine different methods of producing primary care providers for mentally distressed people. They conclude that registered nurses with general training do not appear a reliable source of recruits to the field and that a ‘nursing’ approach to the issue may not well serve the interests of mental health. Instead, the authors propose the use of entry-level specialists who are divorced from general nursing. Such specialists would ensure that shortages of registered nurses do not adversely affect the care of mentally distressed persons. KEYWORDS: Registered nursespsychiatric nursesnurse shortagesnursingmental healthpsychiatrymental distresscarers

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.015
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.716
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0150.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.005
Science and technology studies0.0050.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.440
Teacher spread0.394 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSocial Work in Public HealthSame topicWorkplace Health and Well-beingFrench-language works237,207