MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2512844751

Addressing Social Isolation in Hearing Rehabilitation

2016· article· en· W2512844751 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Marilyn Reed

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian acoustics · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicHearing Loss and Rehabilitation
Canadian institutionsBaycrest HospitalUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLonelinessSocial isolationHearing lossPsychologyRehabilitationContext (archaeology)Isolation (microbiology)CognitionQuality of life (healthcare)ClubCognitive declineDementiaMedicineGerontologyAudiologyPsychiatryPsychotherapist
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Recent findings from large population based studies highlight the connection between hearing loss and cognitive declines in older adults. Although the causal mechanisms remain unknown, the impact of age-related hearing loss on communication and its effect on social interactions has been proposed as one likely pathway.  Due to the severity of their communication difficulties, many seniors with hearing loss are unable to participate in groups and choose to avoid social encounters rather than deal with their challenges and frustrations.The resulting social isolation often leads to loneliness and depression, known to have a significant impact on healthy aging and quality of life. In the absence of a cure for dementia, there is a pressing need to address potential modifiable risk factors for cognitive decline. Due to the nature of auditory aging, communication challenges in the elderly may not be adequately addressed by amplification alone, and additional audiologic rehabilitation is often needed. Audiologists can teach compensatory behavioral communication strategies to improve top down processing and help to compensate for sensory deficits. Group rehab programs not only help older adults become more effective communicators, they also foster their participation and social interaction, known to promote cognitive health. This presentation describes the Hard of Hearing Club, an innovative approach to hearing rehabilitation for seniors with severe hearing loss at risk for social isolation. The club uses a social context to provide a supportive, accessible environment that addresses the activity/participation needs of these clients, in keeping with the WHO ICF model. Group members can function effectively as communicators, observing their own ‘rules for communication’, so that social interactions are positive and rewarding rather than the usual frustrating negative experiences to be avoided. The goals, outcomes of qualitative evaluation and reasons for the group’s success will be reported and discussed. Abstract (294 words)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.023

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0070.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0010.010
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.075
GPT teacher head0.310
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian acousticsSame topicHearing Loss and RehabilitationFrench-language works237,207