Improving the Digestibility of Lentil Flours and Protein Isolate and Characterization of Their Enzymatically Prepared Hydrolysates
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Raw and cooked lentil flours and protein isolate were digested using one-step-multi-enzyme, two-step-sequential multi-enzyme or pre-hydrolyzed with one-step-single-enzyme systems. In vitro protein digestibility values ranged between 22.3 and 94.4%. Sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis revealed minimal loss of intact protein and more extensive digestion after actinidin and acid-protease pre-hydrolysis, respectively. Size exclusion high-performance liquid chromatography analysis confirmed greater loss of high molecular mass polypeptides after acid-protease pre-hydrolysis compared to the other enzymes. Additional digestion of pre-hydrolyzed samples using trypsin-α-chymotrypsin-peptidase resulted in further digestion and release of lower molecular mass peptides. The study demonstrates how different processing treatments and the use of enzymes (alone/in combination) influence lentil protein digestion.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it