Manganese Dioxide Electrode: Attempts to Increase the Electrochemical Utilization
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Manganese dioxide has been the subject of intense research in recent years since it has been demonstrated that they are characterized by pseudocapacitor properties. Furthermore, hybrid electrochemical capacitor using a negative carbon electrode and positive manganese dioxide electrode together with an aqueous electrolyte allows to prepare a device with a higher cell voltage than either carbon/carbon or manganese dioxide/manganese dioxide symetrical electrochemical capacitor. Unfortunately, the high theoretical specific capacity of a manganese electrode cannot be obtained when thick and industrially relevant electrodes are investigated. In fact, no more than 20% of the manganese dioxide-based electrode material is electrochemically addressable. In this talk, attempts to increase the electrochemical utilization of manganese dioxide will be presented. Our recent studies focussing on the effect of carbon additives, shape of manganese dioxide particles, electrode formulation and electrolyte, including water-in-salt electrolyte, on the performance of manganese dioxide electrode tested in the three-electrode configuration (single electrode characterization) and as a full system will be investigated (1-4). 1. A. Gambou Bosca, D. Bélanger, Effect of the formulation of the electrode on the pore texture and electrochemical performance of the manganese dioxide-based electrode for application in a hybrid electrochemical capacitor. Journal of Materials Chemistry A., 2014, 2, 6463-6473. 2. A. Gambou Bosca, D. Bélanger, Chemical mapping and electrochemical performance of manganese dioxide/activated carbon based composite electrode for asymmetric electrochemical capacitor. Journal of the Electrochemical Society. 2015, 162, A5115-A5123. 3. A. Gambou Bosca, D. Bélanger, Electrochemical accessibility of porous submicron MnO2 spheres as active electrode materials for electrochemical capacitors, Electrochimica Acta, accepted. 4. A. Gambou Bosca, D. Bélanger, Electrochemical Characterization of MnO2-Based Composite in the Presence of Salt-in-Water and Water-in-Salt Electrolytes as Electrode for Electrochemical Capacitors, J. Power Sources, submitted.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".