Identificación de calidad del servicio de gas domiciliario en Atlántico, Valle del Cauca y Bogotá, partiendo de peticiones, quejas y reclamos
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This research identifies the quality levels of residential gas service based on petitions, complaints, and claims in the departments of Atlántico, Valle del Cauca, and in the city of Bogotá from 2006 to the first quarter of 2015. The information for this period was taken from the database of the Utilities Unique Information System (SUI for its name in Spanish) of the Superintendency of Residential Utilities. The analysis of the quantitative information gathered in order to measure the quality of the residential service indicates that the service has presented frequent interruptions since 2009, when the complaintsregarding quality, connections, and procedures increased considerably (getting the highest point in 2014.) On the other hand, the levels of dissatisfaction are higher in Valle del Cauca and Atlántico than in Bogotá. The results of the study indicate that companies should adjust the service provided and improve their response time when dealing with petitions, complaints, and claims from the users.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it