A Recursive Method for Clock Synchronization in Asymmetric Packet-Based Networks
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the context of the IEEE 1588 Precision Time Protocol (PTP), estimating the delay's bias is a problem that appears in both one-way (using transparent devices) or two-way message exchange mechanisms. For estimating the offset via the two-way message exchange mechanism, it is usually assumed that the expected value of delays in forward and reverse directions are equal. However, this is not a realistic assumption for packet-based wide area networks, where delays in down-link and up-link directions may have a significant difference. In this work, we propose a solution to estimate the random delay's bias and improve the synchronization accuracy of IEEE 1588. Our method is easy to implement and is compatible with the current version of the protocol. We compared our results to no bias correction and the Boot-strap method. In addition to the improvement in synchronization accuracy, our method allows us to update the slave clock recursively. The proposed method works well even in the presence of large frequency offsets and can also be implemented by using different filters.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it