Due gialli a Roma tra via Merulana e Piazza Vittorio: Gadda e Lakhous a confronto
Bibliographic record
Abstract
<i>Quer Pasticciaccio brutto de via Merulana</i> di Carlo Emilio Gadda (1957) e <i>Scontro di civiltà per un ascensore a Piazza Vittorio</i> di Amara Lakhous (2006) raccontano entrambi un omicidio che sconvolge la quotidianità di due quartieri romani: il primo, ambientato in epoca fascista, rimane un mistero grazie all’incompiutezza voluta dell’opera; il secondo, ambientato invece in una Roma multiculturale contemporanea, si risolve nonostante la “doppia verità” a cui giungono le indagini. Oltre a prendere in esame i vari livelli di intertestualità che vanno dall’uso dialettale all’ironia, dal continuo spostamento tra il particolare e l’universale alle sperimentazioni narrative che danno luogo al “romanzo enciclopedico”, il saggio vorrebbe dimostrare, tramite analisi comparativa, come i due romanzi si incontrino soprattutto nell’intento di evidenziare il disagio esistenzialista della società che oltrepassa sia il “giallo”, sia la “verità” che si trova sempre altrove.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.012 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".