MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2513353781

Дихотомия политического движения женщин Канады

2015· article· ru· W2513353781 on OpenAlex
Королева Татьяна Алексеевна

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueVestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta Filologiya · 2015
Typearticle
Languageru
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical sciencePaternalismContext (archaeology)PoliticsIdeologyConvictionState (computer science)Feminist movementFeminismSocial movementGender studiesSociologyPolitical economyLawHistory
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The article discusses the features of the women's political movement in Canada. The origin and development of the women's movement in Canada fits into the overall context of women's struggle for their rights in the most socio-politically and economically developed countries of the world. The article examines the main stages of this socio-political movement, which had an enormous impact on the transformation of the modern state and society of Canada. In the period between 1880 and 1920 there was a constant increase in the activity of Canadian women. Their level of education increased, which prompted them to leave home insulation. The movement for electoral rights for women began in the late 1880s through the formation of organizations at the local and provincial level. It should be noted that many of them had the task of the struggle for the opening of schools and universities for women. In 1918, the struggle of Canadian women reached some success: they won the right to vote in national elections, but they still had quite a long struggle for the right to vote in elections at the provincial level, it ended only in 1940. The second wave of Canadian feminism is characterized by a growing conviction of its participants that men and women do not essentially differ from each other, and the differences are formed by the social environment. Women began to question the very foundation of Canadian society with its dominant ideology of paternalism, which logically led to their awareness of the need to radically change traditional ideas about the place of women in society. Non-white, disabled women, representatives of the lower social strata, lesbians had different ideas on the place of women in families claiming that there are many more problems of women in Canada than white and middle class women say. In 1980, small, local women's groups began to appear. They represented the needs of particular categories of women and allowed women from marginalized groups to express their concern that the majority of white, heterosexual feminists do not adequately take into account differences in race, religion, ethnicity, age and sexual orientation. At the political level in the 1980s, all provinces increased the representation of women in legislative bodies of the regions. During the following years, almost all parties of Canada significantly changed the conditions for equal participation of women in the governing body. The third wave of the feminist movement of women of Canada is designed to intensify the feminist movement, to achieve the overall goal the second wave has not, yet with a focus on addressing specific women's issues that are characteristic of different regions of Canada, as well as to take into account the current changes in the world that have a contradictory impact on women. Despite the existing problems and contradictions, typical of any social movements, women's political movement has had and continues to have a major impact on public consciousness and public policy of Canada, contributing to the formulation of optimal solutions for many social and political problems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.270
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0030.005
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.011

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it