The Pope and Mussolini: The Secret History of Pius XI and the Rise of Fascism in Europe
Bibliographic record
Abstract
What role did Pius XI play during the Fascist era? Did the Pope collaborate with the Mussolini regime? Did he successfully counter Fascism in Italy, or did Mussolini successfully inculcate Fascist values in the country? The controversy took on new vigor with the 2003 and 2006 opening of the archives of Pius XI's reign. David Kertzer has mined the new evidence in support of a novel argument, engrossingly presented with vivid portrayals of significant personalities. This is an elegant page-turner accessible to all interested readers. Kertzer's Vatican personalities—some cautious toward the Fascist regime, some collaborating, some hostile—all tugged at Vatican policy. Capturing this is a notable feat in a literature that often sees the Pope as the sole originator of Vatican policies. For Kertzer, Achille Ratti—the former prefect of the Vatican Library who was crowned Pope in 1922—maintained the high sanctity and sovereignty of his office: his style was remote, authoritarian, peremptory, brusque: his way of keeping his flock on the true path. Yet papal absolutism was not what it seemed, and Vatican subordinates often worked at cross-purposes. For example, the Pope opposed the 1935 invasion of Ethiopia, fearing it would undermine efforts to build a native Catholic hierarchy there, and publicly called for a peaceful resolution of the conflict. However, the Vatican newspaper L'Osservatore romano revised and misrepresented his words. Again, in 1938 Pius criticized the new laws based upon racism, famously telling an audience of Belgian Catholics that “we are all spiritually Semites”; and yet Vatican Secretary of State Cardinal Eugenio Pacelli made sure the statement did not appear in the Vatican newspaper. If the Pope considered himself a spiritual Louis XIV, he was often blocked by his Vatican barons.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.011 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".