MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2513519045 · doi:10.1190/segam2016-13848102.1

Attenuation of swell noise in marine streamer data via nonnegative matrix factorization

2016· article· en· W2513519045 on OpenAlexaff
Yoones Vaezi, Nasser Kazemi

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicUnderwater Acoustics Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSwellAttenuationNon-negative matrix factorizationMatrix decompositionNoise (video)Matrix (chemical analysis)AcousticsGeologyFactorizationOceanographyPhysicsComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceMaterials scienceAlgorithmOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

High-amplitude swell noise is a common sort of noise in marine seismic surveys. It can obscure the lower amplitude signals of interest and result in erroneous imaging and consequently wrong interpretations of the data. Therefore, it is of great importance to attenuate them in the early processing steps. In this paper we propose a new alternating minimization technique for swell noise attenuation which is based on non-negative matrix factorization of the power spectrum of the time-frequency representation of the signal and noise components of the data. The key element of our method is that the noise has sufficiently different time-frequency characteristics with respect to the signals of interest. The noise component is trained by a data-driven dictionary learning step. We have successfully applied this technique to a shot gather largely contaminated by swell noise. The swell noise is reduced significantly with very little impacts on the useful signals. We suggest that this method can be applied to ground roll attenuation as well. Presentation Date: Monday, October 17, 2016 Start Time: 3:45:00 PM Location: 140 Presentation Type: ORAL

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.492
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicUnderwater Acoustics ResearchFrench-language works237,207