Effects of initial conditions and coupling competition modes on behaviors of coupled non-identical fractional-order bistable oscillators
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The effects of the initial conditions and the coupling competition modes on the dynamic behaviors of coupled non-identical fractional-order bistable oscillators are investigated intensively and the various phenomena are explored. The coupled system can be controlled to form chaos synchronization, chaos anti-phase synchronization, amplitude death, oscillation death, etc., by setting the initial conditions or selecting the coupling competition modes. Depending on whether the arbitrary initial conditions can let two coupled oscillators stop oscillating, the dynamic behaviors of the coupled system are further classified into three types, that is, both of oscillators stop oscillating, only one oscillator stops oscillating, and none of oscillators stop oscillating. Based on the principle of Monte Carlo method, the percentages of three types of dynamic behaviors are calculated for the different coupling competition modes and the dynamic behaviors of the coupled system are characterized from the perspective of statistics. Moreover, the mechanism behind the various phenomena is explained in detail by the concept of boundary layer and the optimum coupling competition modes are found.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".