MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2513660736 · doi:10.1109/plasma.2016.7534013

High-speed imaging and electrical diagnostics of interacting arcs in dual-cathode electric arc furnace

2016· article· en· W2513660736 on OpenAlexaff
D. Burkat, Felipe Aristizabal, Sylvain Coulombe

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicWelding Techniques and Residual Stresses
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCathodeAnodeElectric arcVoltageArc (geometry)Materials scienceElectrodeElectrical engineeringComputer scienceMechanical engineeringPhysicsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Summary form only given. Electric arc furnaces (EAFs) are ubiquitous in the steelmaking industry, and find an increasing number of applications in municipal solid waste gasification and resource (energy and material) recovery from industrial wastes (e.g. recovery from mining residues). The dual-cathode configuration is used to form two individual arcs with a common anode, which contains the material under treatment. A multi-cathode arrangement enables different heat load patterns on the anode and more flexibility in the operating conditions. Such system is also the host of complex arc interactions through the Lorentz force. At short cathode tip-to-anode distances, two relatively independent arcs are formed in the dual-cathode configuration. As the arcs are elongated, partial merging of the arcs at the anode occurs, and a complete merging on the anode takes place at large gaps. Complex and intermittent arc patterns form with their associated voltage and current signatures. In this contribution we describe the distinct arc structures and corresponding voltage/current signatures that occur in a dual-cathode DC EAF using graphite electrodes and argon as the working gas. A 5 kHz synchronized data acquisition system for voltage, current and high-speed imaging was used to observe the arcs' dynamics and the resulting voltage and current signature. An image processing code was developed to measure the length of the arcs and to identify arc structure on each frame captured. The algorithm first locates the arcs' attachment points on the electrodes and then Dijkstra's shortest path algorithm is used to reconstruct the path of highest brightness between the anode and cathode attachment points. Preliminary experimental observations and image analyses revealed the existence of four different arc structures. We report on the possibility of distinguishing these four structures by analyzing the voltage and current signals.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicWelding Techniques and Residual StressesFrench-language works237,207