Improved principal component analysis for 3D seismic data simultaneous reconstruction and denoising
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The principal component analysis (PCA) is an effective proper orthogonal decomposition (POD) method for data analysis. The target of the PCA is to reduce the dimensionality of a data set and retain the variance presented in the data set as much as possible. We assume the random noise and irregularly missing data are additive and uncorrelated with the signal, and utilize the PCA method to simultaneously reconstruct and de-noise seismic data. In fact, PCA is to find a lower dimensional optimal approximation of the initial data in the least-squares sense. However, the signal has a deflection to the optimal approximation in this lower dimensional space. For this reason, we derive a fine-tuned operator acting on the extracted principal components to make the reconstructed data closer to the signal. Application of this proposed improved method on synthetic and field seismic data demonstrates a superior performance comparing with the traditional PCA. Presentation Date: Tuesday, October 18, 2016 Start Time: 1:00:00 PM Location: 148 Presentation Type: ORAL
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".