MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2513712453

Lucie Laumonier, Solitudes et solidarités en ville. Montpellier, mi XIIIe-fin XVe siècle. Turnhout, Brepols, 2015, 426 p.

2016· article· fr· W2513712453 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Julie Pilorget

Bibliographic record

VenueClio. Femmes, Genre, Histoire · 2016
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMedieval and Early Modern Justice
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtHumanitiesFin de siecleArt history
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Chercheure a l’universite du Minnesota et docteure en histoire des universites de Montpellier III et de Sherbrooke (Canada), Lucie Laumonier a publie en 2015, aux editions Brepols, un ouvrage intitule Solitudes et solidarites en ville. Montpellier, mi XIIIe-fin XVe siecles. Ce travail, resultat d’une these realisee sous la direction de Genevieve Dumas et Daniel Le Blevec, consiste en un examen detaille de ceux et celles qui, echappant aux solidarites familiales, vivent seuls a la fin du Moyen...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.181
Threshold uncertainty score0.359

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0040.003
Scholarly communication0.0050.004
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0480.011

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.319
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClio. Femmes, Genre, HistoireSame topicMedieval and Early Modern JusticeFrench-language works237,207