Influence of Potential Future Sea-Level Rise on Tides in the China Sea
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Kuang, C.; Liang, H.; Mao, X.; Karney, B.; Gu, J.; Huang, H.; Chen, W., and Song, H., 2017. Influence of potential future sea-level rise on tides in the China Sea.This study investigates the diurnal and semidiurnal tidal responses of the entire China Sea to a potential rise in sea level of 0.5–2 m. A modified two-dimensional tidal model based on MIKE21 is primarily configured and validated for the present situation; then, three (0.5, 1, 2 m) sea-level rise (SLR) scenarios are simulated with this model. The predicted results show that the principal lunar semidiurnal (M2) and diurnal (K1) tidal constituents respond to SLR in a spatially nonuniform manner. Generally, changes of M2 and K1 amplitudes in shallow waters are larger than those in the deep sea, and significant tidal alterations mainly occur in the Bohai and Yellow seas, Jianghua Bay, Hangzhou Bay, Taiwan Strait, Yangtze River estuary, Pearl River estuary, and Beibu Bay. Possible mechanisms further discussed for these changes mainly relate to bottom friction decreasing, amphidromic point migration, and resonant effect change. Additionally, simulated changes in M2 and K1 amplitudes in response to three SLR scenarios imply that M2 amplitude changes are proportional to the magnitude of SLR, whereas this proportionality does not hold for K1 amplitudes. Identifying the response of tides in the China Sea to SLR not only increases our knowledge of tidal systems, but also assists in setting conservation requirements and management plans in coastal areas.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it