Visible/near infrared reflectance spectroscopy for predicting composition and tracing system of production of beef muscle
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Muscle chemical analysis and muscle identification both were attempted by using visible and near infrared reflectance spectroscopy (NIRS). Seventy-eight beef muscles (m. longissimus dorsi) from Hereford cattle were used. The samples were scanned in a NIRS monochromator instrument (NIRSystems 6500, Silver Spring, MD, USA) in reflectance mode (log 1/R). Both intact and minced muscle presentation to the instrument were explored. Predictive equations were made using ISI software (Infrasoft International, Port Matilda, PA, USA) and muscle identification was performed by Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and Soft Independent Modelling of Class Analogy (SIMCA). The coefficient of determination in calibration (R 2 CAL ) and standard error in cross validation (SECV) for the intact sample presentation were 009 (SECV: 15·6), 0·89 (SECV: 46·9), 0·48 (SECV: 23·9) for moisture (M), fat and crude protein (CP) on g/kg fresh weight basis respectively. R2CAL and SECV for minced sample presentation were 0·41 (SECV: 161), 0·92 (SECV: 43·4), 0·71 (SECV: 20·5) for M, fat and CP on g/kg fresh weight basis respectively. Qualitative analysis of optical information through PCA and SIMCA analysis showed differences in muscles resulting from two different feeding systems.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".