MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Comparison Of Salt-, Glycerol- And Salt + Glycerol-Induced Hyperhydration On Fluid Balance In Young Men

2016· article· en· W2514000179 on OpenAlexaff
Eric DB Goulet, Félix-Antoine Savoie, M. J. Melancon, Adrien De La Flore

Bibliographic record

VenueMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicThermoregulation and physiological responses
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGlycerolChemistryHematocritAnimal scienceFluid intakeCrossover studySodiumInternal medicineEndocrinologyBiochemistryMedicinePlacebo

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hyperhydrating before prolonged physical work with limited fluid intake may help maintain or limit the degradation of physiological functions and endurance. Adding sodium or glycerol to a hyperhydration solution optimizes fluid retention, with the former compound being more efficient than the latter. Mechanistically, sodium and glycerol produce their effects by acting on the osmoreceptors and kidneys, respectively. Hence, if added concurrently to a hyperhydration solution, their impact on fluid retention could potentially be greater than their singular effect. PURPOSE: Compare the effects of salt (SIH)-, glycerol (GIH)- and salt + glycerol (SGIH)-induced hyperhydration on fluid balance responses during a 3h hyperhydration protocol. METHODS: Using a randomized, crossover and counterbalanced protocol, 15 young men (22 ± 4 yrs, 63 ± 7 kg fat-free mass (FFM)) underwent three, 3h hyperhydration protocols. During the first 60 min of each trial, they ingested 30 mL/kg FFM of artificially sweetened water with either 1) 7.5 g of salt/L (SIH); 2) 1.4 g glycerol/kg FFM (GIH) or; 3) 7.5 g of salt/L + 1.4 g glycerol/kg FFM (SGIH). Changes in urine production, fluid retention, hemoglobin, hematocrit, plasma volume and abdominal discomfort were monitored throughout the trials. RESULTS: Participants ingested 1885 ± 199 mL (24.9 ± 1.6 mL/kg bodyweight) of artificially sweetened water with either 14.0 ± 1.5 g of salt (SIH), 90.9 ± 8.5 g of glycerol (1.2 ± 0.1 g/kg bodyweight) (GIH) or both (SGIH). After 3h, there were no significant differences among treatments for hematocrit and plasma volume changes (SIH: 11.3 ± 9.9; GIH: 7.6 ± 12.7; SGIH: 11.3 ± 13.7%), but hemoglobin (SIH: 14.3 ± 1.0; GIH: 14.9 ± 1.3; SGIH: 14.5 ± 1.1 mg/dL) was lower with SIH than GIH, with no difference between SGIH and GIH or SIH. Urine production (SIH: 775 ± 329; GIH: 1248 ± 270; SGIH: 551 ± 208 mL) and fluid retention (SIH: 1127 ± 212; GIH: 729 ± 115; SGIH: 1435 ± 140 mL) were significantly different among treatments. Abdominal discomfort was low and not significantly different among treatments. CONCLUSION: Results show that SGIH reduces urine production and improves fluid retention compared with SIH or GIH. These findings may have implications for laborers, military personal and serious but non-competitive athletes since the ingestion of glycerol is prohibited by the WADA.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.334
Teacher spread0.302 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseSame topicThermoregulation and physiological responsesFrench-language works237,207