MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2514002568 · doi:10.1007/jhep09(2016)048

Erratum to: Physics from solar neutrinos in dark matter direct detection experiments

2016· erratum· en· W2514002568 on OpenAlexaff
D. G. Cerdeño, Malcolm Fairbairn, Thomas Jubb, P. Machado, Aaron C. Vincent, Céline Bœhm

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of High Energy Physics · 2016
Typeerratum
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicDark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena
Canadian institutionsInstitute of Particle Physics
FundersScience and Technology Facilities Council
KeywordsPhysicsDark matterParticle physicsNeutrinoTable (database)Physics beyond the Standard ModelSection (typography)Coupling (piping)Missing energyNuclear physicsLeptonDatabaseElectron

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We correct 1) missing factors of 2 in cross section expressions in table 4 of the published article; and 2) the LUX bound in figure 6 on the B-L coupling from 2015 data, which displayed erroneously strong constraints due to a computer error. Conclusions remain unchanged.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.024
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.032
Threshold uncertainty score0.108

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.024
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0030.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0320.030

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations93
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of High Energy PhysicsSame topicDark Matter and Cosmic PhenomenaFrench-language works237,207