MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2514038949 · doi:10.1109/iscas.2016.7527478

Efficient ILP-based variant-grid analog router

2016· article· en· W2514038949 on OpenAlexaff
Mohammad Torabi, Lihong Zhang

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicVLSI and FPGA Design Techniques
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRouterComputer scienceRouting (electronic design automation)Static routingPolicy-based routingInteger programmingLinear programmingLink-state routing protocolEqual-cost multi-path routingMultipath routingComputer networkDistributed computingRouting protocolAlgorithm

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As an indispensable portion in the modern system-on-chip designs, analog circuits are becoming more intractable and error prone in the time-consuming design process due to the nature of high parasitic sensitivity along with the shrinking design window in the advanced technology. Compared to the digital counterpart, analog circuits need to be designed more carefully taking into account special analog constraints besides the typical geometric requirements. Recent state-of-the-art analog routing research favors linear programming (LP) to satisfy various constraints, but leaving the routing efficiency as an open question. In this paper, we propose an integer linear programming (ILP) based algorithm to tackle the analog routing problem with a special focus on improving the routing efficiency. Hierarchical routing is developed to help the router to divide the entire routing area into multiple small regions, in each of which the ILP can derive a routing solution with speedy efficiency. Different from typical hierarchical methods, our proposed router deploys variant-grid resolution in different regions, that is, with a lower resolution for less crowded routing regions and a higher resolution for more congested regions. In this way, our proposed ILP-based router is much faster than any typical ones since it spends little time for the areas that do not need to be routed precisely. The experimental results show the high efficiency of our proposed method for both small circuits and especially big circuits without promising the routing quality.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.184
Teacher spread0.178 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicVLSI and FPGA Design TechniquesFrench-language works237,207