MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2514069346 · doi:10.1109/arith.2016.19

A CRC-Based Concurrent Fault Detection Architecture for Galois/Counter Mode (GCM)

2016· article· en· W2514069346 on OpenAlexafffund
Amir Ali Kouzeh Geran, Arash Reyhani-Masoleh

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCryptographic Implementations and Security
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersCMC Microsystems
KeywordsComputer scienceCritical path methodFault coverageCyclic redundancy checkFault detection and isolationRedundancy (engineering)Field-programmable gate arrayOverhead (engineering)Galois theoryEmbedded systemParallel computingAlgorithmMathematicsDecoding methodsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Galois/Counter Mode (GCM) is a recently adopted mode of operation for symmetric key cryptography to provide both data authenticity and confidentiality. To improve the reliability of hardware implementations of the GCM module, we propose a novel multiple-bit fault detection architecture for hardware implementation of the GCM module using cyclic redundancy check (CRC) codes. By changing the degree of the CRC generating polynomial, one can select the number of parity bits used in the fault detection scheme based on the available resources and required overheads. We derive new formulations for the corresponding fault-detection scheme for the entire GCM loop. Then, we provide FPGA implementation and fault coverage simulation results for different CRC generating polynomials. We show that using six parity bits, one can achieve high fault coverage of close to 100% with the critical path delay overhead of 23% and area overhead of 10.9% while the false alarm is 0.12%.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCryptographic Implementations and SecurityFrench-language works237,207