MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2514072835 · doi:10.1139/cjp-2016-0321

The generalized uncertainty relation and the quantum entropy of static spherical black hole surrounded by quintessence due to spin fields

2016· article· en· W2514072835 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Gu-Qiang Li

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Physics · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicBlack Holes and Theoretical Physics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsMassless particleQuintessenceQuadratic growthGravitationSchwarzschild metricLoop quantum gravityQuadratic equationQuantum mechanicsQuantum gravityQuantumQuantum electrodynamicsClassical mechanicsGeneral relativityCosmologyDark energy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

By using the brick-wall model, the quantum entropies of static spherical black hole surrounded by quintessence due to the Weyl neutrino, electromagnetic, massless Rarita–Schwinger, and gravitational fields for the source-free case are investigated from a generalized uncertainty relation. It is shown that in addition to the usual quadratically and logarithmically divergent terms, there exist additional quadratic, biquadratic, and logarithmic divergences at ultraviolet σ → 0, which not only depend on the black hole characteristics but also on the spins of the fields and the gravity correction factor. These additional terms describe the contribution of the quantum fields to the entropy and the effect of gravitational interactions on it. After the smallest length scale is taken into account, we find that the contribution of the gravitational interactions to the entropy is larger than the usual dominant term and becomes a part of the whole dominant term, so it is very important and cannot be neglected.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Physics→Same topicBlack Holes and Theoretical Physics→French-language works237,207→