MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2514082328 · doi:10.5539/ach.v8n2p160

Processing Objets Trouves: A Review of Appling Collage Thinking and Techniques in Fashion

2016· review· en· W2514082328 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Ruijuan Ren, Jiangbo Liao

Bibliographic record

VenueAsian Culture and History · 2016
Typereview
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicFashion and Cultural Textiles
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsClass (philosophy)Point (geometry)Process (computing)Field (mathematics)Computer scienceAestheticsFashion designVisual artsArtMathematicsArtificial intelligenceClothingHistoryProgramming language

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<p class="1Body">Collage is generally applied to synthesise the fragments of forms in visual art to create a new effect. This review discusses the application of collage in fashion with its characteristics and influences developing process as a cut-in point; while in terms of methodology, it analyses and generalises the performance of collage aesthetics and collage form in modern fashion details. The research of collaging application plays an oriented role to process design found objects creatively, thus providing rich design languages and methods in today’s fashion field.</p>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.849
Threshold uncertainty score0.758

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAsian Culture and HistorySame topicFashion and Cultural TextilesFrench-language works237,207