MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2514120370 · doi:10.29173/alr233

The 2007 CAPL Operating Procedure

2009· article· en· W2514120370 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Craig Spurn, Jana Prete, Melissa Zerebeski

Bibliographic record

VenueAlberta Law Review · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMarine and Offshore Engineering Studies
Canadian institutionsCalgary Laboratory Services
Fundersnot available
KeywordsKey (lock)Norm (philosophy)EconomicsComputer scienceOperations researchRisk analysis (engineering)BusinessLaw and economicsIndustrial organizationLawPolitical scienceComputer securityEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article provides an introduction and overview of the 2007 Canadian Association of Petroleum Landmen Operating Procedure and a detailed analysis of certain key provisions and changes made. The article notes that the 2007 Procedure is responsive to significant developments in the Canadian oil and gas industry and constitutes a major update of the Procedure, including in its emphasis on a “norm-based” approach rather than a “standard form” approach and articulating the need for, and cost of, deviating from the provisions of the model form.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.482
Threshold uncertainty score0.389

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2009
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlberta Law ReviewSame topicMarine and Offshore Engineering StudiesFrench-language works237,207