Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, mode composite waveguide (MCW) is proposed, which consists of inner and outer wave-guiding duo structures. The outer structure acts as a rectangular coaxial line suitable for lower frequency operation for its compact size, while the inner structure works as a rectangular waveguide suitable for higher frequency operation thanks to its simple structure and low loss. The MCW can propagate signals in the inner waveguide with TE <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">10</sub> mode and/or the outer waveguide with TEM mode depending on frequency to achieve optimal performance for both low- and high-frequency operations. In this paper, the fundamental waveguide parameters and higher order modes of the duo waveguides are examined. The proposed MCW prototypes are fabricated on a triple-layer PCB structure using the emerging substrate integration techniques. The MCW is fabricated and measured through the proposed microstrip line to the inner and outer waveguide transitions, and an MCW simultaneous feeding circuit is also presented. For this simultaneous feeding circuit, the good matching is achieved from 7.5 to 10.5 GHz for the low-frequency operation and from 25 to 39 GHz for the high-frequency operation, respectively.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".