MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2514384951 · doi:10.1039/c6cp04600b

In situ growth of MoS<sub>2</sub> nanosheets on reduced graphene oxide (RGO) surfaces: interfacial enhancement of absorbing performance against electromagnetic pollution

2016· article· en· W2514384951 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Chemistry Chemical Physics · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicElectromagnetic wave absorption materials
Canadian institutionsImpact
FundersChina Postdoctoral Science FoundationNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsGrapheneOxideIn situMaterials scienceNanotechnologyGraphene oxide paperChemical engineeringMetallurgyChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Electromagnetic pollution is rising all over the world. Compared with electromagnetic waves reflection, electromagnetic absorption (EA) is a better choice to balance electromagnetic applications and human health. The highly conductive networks in composites, as well as in species, and the intensity of defect polarization are the most important factors to improving the EA performance of a dielectric material. In this study, an in situ one-pot hydrothermal growth of MoS2 layers on reduced graphene oxide (RGO) surfaces was developed for the synthesis of RGO/MoS2 nanosheets. With a filler loading ratio of 20 wt%, the composite of the RGO/MoS2 nanosheets could build conductive networks and exhibited an effective EA bandwidth (lower than -10 dB) of 5.7 GHz and a minimum reflection loss (RL) of -60 dB. The results revealed that the as-prepared RGO/MoS2 nanosheets are promising EA materials, with broad and strong absorption properties at a low filler loading and low thickness.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it