Detection of Subconscious Face Recognition Using Consumer-Grade Brain-Computer Interfaces
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We test the possibility of tapping the subconscious mind for face recognition using consumer-grade BCIs. To this end, we performed an experiment whereby subjects were presented with photographs of famous persons with the expectation that about 20% of them would be (consciously) recognized; and since the photos are of famous persons, we expected that subjects would have seen before some of the 80% they didn’t (consciously) recognize. Further, we expected that their subconscious would have recognized some of those in the 80% pool that they had seen before. An exit questionnaire and a set of criteria allowed us to label recognitions as conscious, false, no recognitions, or subconscious recognitions. We analyzed a number of event related potentials training and testing a support vector machine. We found that our method is capable of differentiating between no recognitions and subconscious recognitions with promising accuracy levels, suggesting that tapping the subconscious mind for face recognition is feasible.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it